Legal Opinion
Riordan v. Ferguson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
These are two motions by defendant and third-party defendant (l)',to dismiss'thé complaint on the ground that the court ha's no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action, and (2) for summary judgment on the ground that there exists no genuine and triable issue of fact. , ..
The facts of this litigation may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff in the within action is apparently attempting to foreclose a mortgage upon certain lands in Westchester County, New York. The plaintiff’s claims are based upon a certain instrument in writing which conditionally…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Porto Rico v. Rosaly Y CastilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Federal Land Bank v. PriddySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Riordan v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Baker Castor Oil Co. v. Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Bombacino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Riordan v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Joe Murray's Point Lookout, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973