Legal Opinion

Handelman v. Olen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, entered on June 7, 1960, denying defendant-appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113, in an action to recover the agreed value of professional legal services consequent upon a corporate merger and upon the promissory notes representing the balance of the agreed value, reversed, on the law, with. $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted to the extent of dismissing the complaint under subdivision 4 of rule 106…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. In Re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Greenberg v. Jerome H. Remick & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. McAvoy v. SchrammeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  5. McAvoy v. SchrammeNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prial v. Supreme Court Uniformed Officers Ass'nAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1977
  2. Jacobson v. SassowerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  3. Wald v. WaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API