Legal Opinion

Ammerman v. Crosby

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1866PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from the Huntington Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Suit by Crosby, the appellee, against Ammerman, the appellant, for a malicious prosecution. The court overruled a demurrer to the complaint, to which the defendant excepted. This ruling is assigned for error. The first objection urged to the complaint is that it does not contain a sufficient “title of the cause,” as required by the 49th section of the code.

The objection cannot be sustained. The complaint commenced as follows: “ In the Court of Common Pleas of Huntington county, October term, A. D. 1863. Charles Crosby complains of John Am,merman, and says,” &c. This was a substantial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newell v. DownsIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Wilkinson v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Oliver v. PateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Colter v. LowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Smith v. State ex rel. HamillIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Town of Windfall City v. State ex rel. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API