Ammerman v. Crosby
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Huntington Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
Suit by Crosby, the appellee, against Ammerman, the appellant, for a malicious prosecution. The court overruled a demurrer to the complaint, to which the defendant excepted. This ruling is assigned for error. The first objection urged to the complaint is that it does not contain a sufficient “title of the cause,” as required by the 49th section of the code.
The objection cannot be sustained. The complaint commenced as follows: “ In the Court of Common Pleas of Huntington county, October term, A. D. 1863. Charles Crosby complains of John Am,merman, and says,” &c. This was a substantial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Newell v. DownsIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
- Wilkinson v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by21 opinions
- Oliver v. PateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Colter v. LowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Smith v. State ex rel. HamillIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Town of Windfall City v. State ex rel. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.