Hedgepeth v. Rose's Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff’s evidence, considered in the light most favorable to her, was sufficient to support a finding of negligence on the part of the defendant which proximately caused plaintiff’s injuries. We agree with the trial court that it was not.
Numerous cases have noted the general rule that the owner or proprietor of a business, though not an insurer of the safety of his customers, does owe a duty to keep in a reasonably safe condition those portions of the premises which he may expect customers to use during regular business…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chapman v. ClothierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Wegner v. Delly-Land Delicatessen, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Garner v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Hinson v. Cato's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Barnes v. Hotel O.Henry Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gibson v. UsseryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Pasour v. PierceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Barnes v. Wilson Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Shepard v. Catawba Coll.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- Shepard v. Catawba Coll.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020