Legal Opinion

Pattison v. W.W. Grainger, Inc., Unpublished Decision (4-13-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 2006No. 86698UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-employer W.W. Grainger, Inc. terminated plaintiff-employee Wally Pattison, a fifty-year-old salesperson, when he failed to make his sales goal for the fifth consecutive year. Believing himself to be the victim of age discrimination, Pattison brought suit alleging age discrimination and wrongful discharge in violation of Ohio public policy. He sought compensation in the form of back and front pay, as well as punitive damages. Grainger filed a motion for summary judgment in which it argued that Pattison failed to set forth a prima facie case of age…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Ferraro v. B.F. Goodrich CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Gessner v. City of UnionOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pattison v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pattison v. W.W. Grainger, Inc., 88556 (6-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API