Legal Opinion
Pattison v. W.W. Grainger, Inc., 88556 (6-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 2007No. 88556PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Wally Pattison appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellees W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Sam DiMeo on his complaint alleging age discrimination. We find that appellant did not timely file this appeal under App.R. 4(A). We therefore lack jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal.
{¶ 2} Appellant filed a two-count complaint alleging age discrimination and violation of public policy. The court granted Grainger and DiMeo summary judgment on the age discrimination count, and appellant appealed. We dismissed the appeal for want of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clayton Coffey v. Foamex L.P., and Recticel Foam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- General Aviation, Inc. v. The Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Denham v. City of New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Denham v. New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Robert W. Johnston v. H. G. CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pattison v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- Baruk v. Heritage Club Homeowners' Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Groen v. Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Welsh Development Co. v. Warren Cty. Reg., Ca2008-02-026 (3-16-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009