Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Farrar

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1977PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Justice.

This divorce action raises two questions: (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decree and (2) whether proof of adultery may form the basis of a divorce grounded on a charge of cruel and inhuman treatment. The trial judge dismissed the husband’s complaint and awarded the petitioner (wife) a divorce, under her counterclaim, on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the award of divorce was not justified by the pleadings and the proof. We granted certiorari to examine the correctness of this holding.

I

Dr. James T.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lingner v. LingnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Chappell v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  3. Greene v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  4. Baber v. BaberTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brooks v. BrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Berryhill v. RhodesTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hyde v. HydeTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Kelly v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  5. Berryhill v. RhodesTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API