Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. London

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1964No. A-9601PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Justice.

Respondent, as plaintiff in the trial court, filed a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, against petitioner, as defendant and compensation insurance carrier of plaintiff’s employer, alleging that he had suffered total disability from an injury received in the course of plaintiff’s employment as the result of an accidental injury to plaintiff’s left leg and right and left hands. Plaintiff, by a trial amendment, in the alternative pleaded that he received injury to specific members of his body, to-wit: to his left leg and to his right and left hands.

With regard to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Insurance v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Texas Employers Insurance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. MaledonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Griffith v. GoforthTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. HollingsheadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leos v. State Employees Workers' Compensation DivisionTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Perez, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  4. City of Austin v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Herrin v. Standard Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API