Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Kilburn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1992No. A14-92-00175-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEARS, Justice.

Appellant, The City of Houston, appeals from an interlocutory order denying its Motion for Summary Judgment based on governmental immunity. We dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction.

Daniel W. Kilbum (“Kilburn”) notified the City of Houston’s animal control department that his two pit bull guard dogs had escaped, and requested the department’s help in retrieving them. In an attempt to recover the dogs, an animal control employee shot and killed the pit bulls. Kilburn sued the City of Houston (“City”) and its employee for the destruction of his dogs. The City filed special…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. KilburnTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Village of Bayou Vista v. Glaskox, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
  3. City of Irving v. Pak, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  4. City of Beverly Hills v. Guevara, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
  5. Greatwood Community Association, Inc. v. Prince David Ofor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API