Legal Opinion
Danskin v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 20, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Trenchard, J.
This writ of error brings up for review a judgment in favor of the defendants entered in the Supreme Court upon a nonsuit at the Monmouth circuit. ■
The action is brought by the administratrix of James F. Danskin to recover for the death of the latter in a collision with a train operated by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company on the railroad controlled by the New York and Long Branch Railroad Company at an unguarded double-track crossing at Belmar.
*527When the ease was here before (47 Vroom 660) the plaintiff’s judgment against both defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Conkling v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- McLean v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Danskin v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Consolidated Traction Co. v. BehrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Hartman v. City of BrigantineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Shutka v. Pennsylvania RR Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Ackerley v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Cecelia Watn, Administratrix and Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of John Martin Watn, Deceased v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company and Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, Cecelia Watn, Administratrix and Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of John Martin Watn, Deceased v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore LinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.