Legal Opinion

Davis v. Mandekic (In re Estate of Kerkorian)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided January 19, 2018No. B283132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

*81*713Probate Code section 11704 requires an executor to obtain court permission before taking sides in a proceeding to determine who is entitled to a distribution of estate assets. We are asked to decide whether the probate court complied with the statute's requirements when it allowed the executor of Kirk Kerkorian's (Kerkorian's) estate to oppose a petition filed by Kerkorian's former wife seeking a third of her late husband's assets.

I. BACKGROUND

Kerkorian executed a will in July 2013 to govern the distribution of his substantial assets upon his death. On March 30, 2014, Kerkorian married…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tanguilig v. Valdez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Alameda County Waste Mgmt Authority v. Waste Connections US, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Alameda County Waste Mgmt. Authority v. Waste Connections etc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Tanguilig v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API