Legal Opinion

Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Peterson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1913No. 17,043PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Washington county: William A. Rediok, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action for money had and received. For the term of one year from March 23, 1909, plaintiff insured defendant against loss by fire to the extent of $1,300 on a linotype and $200 on a stereotyping plant, and authorized concurrent insurance, which was written in the Hartford Fire Insurance Company to the extent of $1,000 on the linotype and $200 on the stereotyping plant. The building containing the property was destroyed by fire April 27, 1909. This controversy is narrowed to the insurance on the linotype. Plaintiff’s proportion of the liability, estimated at $889.67, was paid to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slade v. Swedeburg Elevator Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gandy v. WiltseNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Massillon Engine & Thresher Co. v. ProutyNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Home Fire Insurance v. BredehoftNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. ElyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Deming v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Dougherty v. RobsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Peterson v. Hartford Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API