Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1939No. 27273PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

1. “Ordinarily, when one renders services or transfers property valuable to another, which the latter accepts, a promise is implied to pay the reasonable value thereof; but this presumption does not usually arise in cases between very near relatives.” Code, § 3-107. Where a person renders valuable services to another, which the latter accepts, a contract to pay therefor is implied in law, unless from the facts and circumstances, including the nature of the services, the relationship between the parties, including kinship, it appears that the services were rendered out of consideration of love…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Jackson v. BuiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Murrell v. StudstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Childs v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hollifield v. Monte Vista Biblical Gardens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Smith Development, Inc. v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Young v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. Lovin v. PossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Freeman v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API