Legal Opinion

State v. Carlson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2003No. 01-1136-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*100N. PATRICK CROOKS, J.

¶ 1. We reverse the court of appeals' decision, which affirmed an order by the Brown County Circuit Court, which denied a motion for a new trial. The motion claimed that one of the jurors could not understand English sufficiently to serve as a juror.

¶ 2. We hold that an ability to understand the English language is necessary in order to satisfy the requirements Wis. Stat. § 756.02 and § 756.04 (1999-2000).1 If a potential juror indicates on the juror questionnaire that he or she is unable to understand English, his or her name shall be struck from the juror pool. If a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. McCallumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. TomlinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. WeedWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. NormanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. Lamont L. TravisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Fond Du Lac County v. Elizabeth M. P.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API