Legal Opinion

Badolato v. Molinari

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by a surety on a bail bond.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The question is whether the surety on a bail bond for a defendant in a criminal action who has not been promised indemnity can recover from the defendant the amount he has been obliged to pay on his bond because of defendant’s failure to appear. The bond in question was one to answer and was executed only by the surety. The defendant did not need to join in it. Code Crim. Pro. § 568.

The general rule is conceded, that a surety may hold his principal on an implied agreement to indemnify even where there is no express promise. But the claim is that this rule does not apply in the case of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. RyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Moloney v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Simpson v. RobertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1866
  5. Carr v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brittan Holland v. Kelly RosenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. EsquivelNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Pierce Associates, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API