Legal Opinion

Heiney v. Will

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1974No. Appeal, No. 391PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

For six months prior to his death, Samuel C. Heiney was aware that he had terminal cancer. During this period his physical condition deteriorated rapidly. Seventeen days prior to his death, Heiney executed a will devising Ms farm to Ms son L. Russell Heiney1 and directing the residue of his estate to be converted *576into cast and divided equally2 among Ms eigM cMldren.3

Six of decedent’s eight cMldren challenged the will. The only evidence presented to the register of wills by contestants was the testimony of a handwriting expert. The proponents of the will called…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Girsh TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Abrams WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Holtz WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Brantlinger WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ZielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. In Re Estate of HastingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Estate of BeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. In Re Estate of HainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. In Re Estate of PresuttiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API