Legal Opinion

Cherry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1983No. 46314PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD M. BELT, Special Judge.

After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied movant’s Rule 27.26 motion. Movant appeals.

Movant was convicted of attempted rape and was sentenced as a prior offender to a fifteen year term with the Department of Corrections. This court dismissed his appeal. Movant filed an amended 27.26 motion and sought to vacate his conviction and sentence because of defects in the information, defects in the sentencing procedure, ineffective assistance of counsel, instructional error and because of circumstances attending the dismissal of his appeal. The trial court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. DurenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. State v. DownsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. King v. SwensonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. State v. JaegerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BechholdMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Newlon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Gilmore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Henderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Caldwell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API