Legal Opinion

Suwannee Steamship Company v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 25, 1973No. C.R.D. 73-3; Court 70/2603PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RE, Judge:

Defendant has moved under Rule 4.-7(b)(2) to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Rule 4.7(b)(2) of the rules of this court provides:

“(b) Defenses: How presented: The following defenses may be made by a motion to dismiss: * * * (2) lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter; * * *. A motion making any of these defenses may be made before answer.”

It is noted at the outset that, when read together with Rules 4.4 through 4.7, it might appear that the jurisdictional defense pleaded may be raised only on a motion to dismiss the complaint,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  2. ASG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  4. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API