Legal Opinion

George C. Houck, Jr. v. H. I. Hinds, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 8, 1954No. 4797PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an income tax case. In his return for the year 1946, George C. Houck, Jr., hereinafter referred to as the taxpayer, treated as capital gain the amount of $1,250 received from a corporation in which he was a shareholder. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that the amount thus received should be treated as a dividend distribution made by the corporation. A deficiency in tax resulted. The deficiency was paid, a claim for refund was seasonably lodged, no action was taken on the claim within six months after the date of its filing, and the suit was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. Benrose Fabrics Corp. v. RosensteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gooding Amusement Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  2. S. Nicholas Jacobs and Dolores I. Jacobs v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Olen F. Featherstone and Martha Featherstone v. Max BarashCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Edens v. New Mexico Health & Social Services DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API