Legal Opinion

City of Rolling Meadows v. Kyle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 1986No. 84-1290PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE RIZZI

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, city of Rolling Meadows, brought an action against defendant, Audrey Kyle, for keeping an undomesticated animal, a monkey, in her home in violation of a city ordinance. Following an evidentiary hearing, the court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant subsequently filed a motion to vacate the judgment and a motion for a new trial. The trial court denied both motions. Defendant appeals. We reverse.

The monkey in question here, Yondi, has resided with defendant and her husband since she was two days old. At the time…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. HicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Springfield v. Board of Election Commissioners of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Mount Carmel v. ParteeIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. The PEOPLE v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Havlik v. MarcinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Evanston v. O'LEARYAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. People ex rel. Baise v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. City of Rolling Meadows v. KyleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API