Legal Opinion

City of Rolling Meadows v. Kyle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 1986No. 84-1290Published

1Opinion of the Court

145 Ill. App.3d 168 (1986)

494 N.E.2d 766

THE CITY OF ROLLING MEADOWS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

AUDREY KYLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 84-1290.

Illinois Appellate Court — First District (3rd Division).

Opinion filed June 4, 1986.

Kenneth D. Ross, and Susan M. Kornfield, both of Chicago, for appellant.

John R. Rafferty, of Chicago, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

PRESIDING JUSTICE RIZZI delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, city of Rolling Meadows, brought an action against defendant, Audrey Kyle, for keeping an undomesticated animal, a monkey, in her home in violation of a city ordinance.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. HicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Springfield v. Board of Election Commissioners of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Mount Carmel v. ParteeIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. The PEOPLE v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Havlik v. MarcinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API