Legal Opinion

Guaranty Mortgage Co. v. Flint

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1925No. 4205PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, C. J.

The complaint contains three causes of action.- Each separate cause of action is upon a note given to respondent corporation for the purchase of shares of stock in the corporation. The answer admits the execution of the notes, but alleges as a defense certain false representations, made by respondent or its agents in procuring the notes. Appellant also counterclaims and seeks damages by reason of the alleged false representations.

The case was tried to the court. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were made. Judgment was entered in favor of respondent for the full amount sought to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StevensIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Ming v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Murray v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  5. McNulty v. DurhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. MartschUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Rummell v. BaileyUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Kinnear v. ProwsUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Blodgett v. MartschUtah Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API