Legal Opinion
Ming v. Woolfolk
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 1, 1886No. 116PublishedCited by 29 opinions
ERROR TO THE SUPREME OOURT OF THE TERRITORY .OF MONTANA. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woods
delivered the-opinion of the court.
The plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs in the court below. They brought this suit against the defendant in error in the District Oourt for the County of Lewis and Clarke, in Montana Territory, and in their petition stated their case substantially as follows:
On September 16, 1874, the defendant made and delivered to the plaintiffs his contract in writing, of which the following is a copy:
“Helena, September 16, 1874.
“Whereas John Kinna and John II. Ming have this day joined with me in borrowing the sum of '$2572.10 twenty-five hundred and seventy-two and…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Green v. Victor Talking MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Clifton v. TombCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Russell v. Industrial Transp. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
- Kimber v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- United States v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.