Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Barnes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1982No. 8128DC470PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff’s appeal is grounded on her contention that a showing of changed circumstances so as to adversely affect the child is not required where the question of custody never has been litigated. It is well-settled that a contractual agreement between the parents is not binding on the court in awarding custody of a minor child. Spence v. Durham, 283 N.C. 671, 198 S.E. 2d 537 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 918, 94 S.Ct. 1417, 39 L.Ed. 2d 473 (1974). However, it does not follow that the terms of a consent judgment regarding custody may be altered without a showing of changed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spence v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Daniels v. HatcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Ebron v. EbronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Pulliam v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API