Legal Opinion

Frank Konarski v. Michael Rankin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 4, 2015No. 13-17384UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Frank, Gabriela, Patricia, John, and Frank E. Konarski, owners of a housing development business in Tucson, appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their complaint against the City of Tucson (the “City”) and several city officials. The Konarskis allege that city officials, in declining to meet with them to discuss a proposed ordinance and in refusing to reconsider an ordered shutdown of one of their housing development projects, have discriminated and retaliated against them in violation of their federal constitutional and statutory civil rights, causing them economic damage…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Hartman v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Menotti v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joseph, D.V.M. v. AbramsDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2018
  2. Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API