Legal Opinion
Wiggins v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 56
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 20, 2006No. CIV. 04-3797PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge.
This case arises out of a vote on a two year extension of a Collective Bargaining Agreement governing the relationship between Heinz North American Pennsauken (“Heinz”) and the United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local Number 56 (“Local 56” or “Union”). Plaintiff Alfonso Green Wiggins alleges that the Defendants — his union and his employer — violated his rights under Sections 101(a)(1), 101(a)(2) and 501 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (“LMRDA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 411(a)(1), 411(a)(2) and 501. The matter is before the Court upon the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Calhoon v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Service Employees InternationalDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Cannon v. Allied Universal Security ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Childs v. The Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Childs v. The Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- REVERS v. UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER , MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNIONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025