Legal Opinion

Maffia v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 16, 1958No. 135-54PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to recover on account of the payment by him, as assignee, of the balance due of $10,800 by one James J. McSweeney on a contract with defendant for the purchase of three surplus tugs. Plaintiff paid this sum pursuant to an assignment of the contract which he had received from McSweeney. Plaintiff alleges that the payment by him was conditioned upon the transfer of the title to the tugs to him, but that defendant transferred title to the original purchaser, instead of to plaintiff.

When this case was before us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, we held…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Maffia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Tuftco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. G. L. Christian & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. J. C. Pitman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API