Legal Opinion

Spradling v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1977No. 7926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIES, Chief Justice.

N. D. Williams, Jr., plaintiff below, brought suit against Hubert Spradling, d/b/a Sprad’s Boat Town, under the Deceptive Trade Practices — Consumer Protection *145Act [Tex.Bus. & Comm.Code Ann. § 17.41, et seq. (Supp.1976-77)], received a judgment for $4,300 actual and $4,300 double damages, after a jury trial, from which Spradling has appealed. The parties will be referred to as they were below.

The court gave the following instruction to the jury:

“DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICE:
“Any false, misleading or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce. You are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Woods v. LittletonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Aronberg v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. Union Oil Co. of California v. RichardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Spradling v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. United Postage Corp. v. KammeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Thomas v. Oil & Gas Building, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Hill v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Gonzalez v. Texas Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API