Legal Opinion

In re Hinds

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided October 29, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[In bankruptcy. In the matter of Joseph N. Hinds, Jacob Allen, Benjamin Allen, and Alvin B. Losee.]

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

This is a petition asking that the amount due upon a judgment rendered against the four bankrupts, as joint debtors, in an action in which Joseph N. Hinds was not served with process, and in which he did not appear (so that there was no judgment upon which his individual property could be sold), be paid out of the proceeds of real estate, the legal title of which was in Joseph N. Hinds alone. The petition concedes that the judgment was not a legal lien upon the individual property of Joseph X. Hinds, and that it could not be sold thereon; but it alleges that the judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edmeston v. LydeNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  2. Garfield v. . HatmakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Hendricks v. RobinsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  4. Corning & Norton v. WhiteNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  5. Brewster v. PowerNew York Court of Chancery · 1844

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Minneapolis Engine & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Bayne v. Brewer Pottery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
  3. Blanks v. West Point Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  5. In re GibbonsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API