Legal Opinion

Conrad v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 8, 2012No. A12A0070PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

George Conrad and Joseph William Presnal were charged with violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act1 after drugs were discovered in each of their bedrooms during the execution of a search warrant. Conrad and Presnal moved to suppress the drug evidence. They contended that, given the inner partitioning of the residential structure, the warrant and the search failed to comply with the Fourth Amendment. The trial court conducted a hearing, summarily denied their motion, then proceeded to a stipulated bench trial. Convicted as charged, Conrad and Presnal filed a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Fair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. Teal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Braun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Alan Braun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Derek B. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. State v. Robert Scott CarteeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API