Legal Opinion
In Re Allstate Texas Lloyd's and James Stabler v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 26, 2024No. 13-24-00395-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
NUMBER 13-24-00395-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYD’S AND JAMES STABLER ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña By petition for writ of mandamus, relators Allstate Texas Lloyd’s and James Stabler contend that the trial court 1 abused its discretion by refusing to dismiss the underlying insurance coverage dispute for want of prosecution. We conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus. 1 This original…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Villarreal v. San Antonio Truck & EquipmentTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- In re GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- In Re American Optical Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.