Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for larceny; from Liberty superior court — Judge Sheppard. May 30, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtBrotles, P. J.
1. All applications for continuances are addressed to the sound legal discretion of the trial judge (Penal Code, § 992), and his decision thereon will not be reversed unless there has been a plain, palpable, and flagrant abuse of this discretion. Curry v. State, 17 Ga. App. 377 (87 S. E. 685), and cases there cited.
2. Upon a motion for a continuance, made by the defendant, and a counter-showing thereto made by the State, the credibility of the witnesses introduced in support of the motion and upon the counter-showing respectively is to be determined by the judge, and his decision in refusing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Curry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Kimberly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boatright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Teems v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925