Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 2, 1917No. 8972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Indictment for larceny; from Liberty superior court — Judge Sheppard. May 30, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBrotles, P. J.

1. All applications for continuances are addressed to the sound legal discretion of the trial judge (Penal Code, § 992), and his decision thereon will not be reversed unless there has been a plain, palpable, and flagrant abuse of this discretion. Curry v. State, 17 Ga. App. 377 (87 S. E. 685), and cases there cited.

2. Upon a motion for a continuance, made by the defendant, and a counter-showing thereto made by the State, the credibility of the witnesses introduced in support of the motion and upon the counter-showing respectively is to be determined by the judge, and his decision in refusing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Kimberly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boatright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Teems v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API