Legal Opinion

Sewell Paint & Glass Co. v. Booth Lumber & Loan Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1932No. 1563-5903PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCritz, J.

For convenience we shall designate the Sewell Paint & Glass Company as the paint company, and Booth Lumber & Loan Company as the lumber company.

In the present suit the lumber company sued the paint company in the district court of Dallas county, Tex., to recover damages for the breach of a verbal warranty. Trial in the district court with a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for the lumber company in the sum of $1,567.61. This judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals at Dallas. 34 S.W.(2d) 650. The paint company brings error.

In July, 1925, the paint company contracted to sell…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. ChipleyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hill v. PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Sewall Paint & Glass Co. v. Booth Lumber & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Martin v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Gray v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Samedan Oil Corp. v. Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2001
  4. Bethel v. Norman Furniture Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  5. Cole v. ZellanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API