Legal Opinion

Glantz v. Gardiner

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 6, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Replevin. Certified under Cap. 298, Sec. 4, General Laws, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This is an action of replevin brought by the plaintiff in the Superior Court for Providence County to recover possession of certain goods attached by the defendant as a deputy sheriff of said county. To this the defendant pleads non cepit and for a second plea, “ that the said goods and chattels in said declaration mentioned were then and there and now are the property of one Prank S. Lockhart alias, 'and as the property of said Prank S. Lockhart alias, were attached and held in custody by the said defendant under and by virtue of a writ of attachment issued out of the Superior Court ” in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wright v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Kidd, Dater & Price Co. v. Musselman Grocer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Thorpe v. Pennock Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Fisher v. HerrmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Cantrell v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fischer v. Rio Tire Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Linn County Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Hartwig v. RushingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. George Kraft Co. v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Griffin v. Puryear-Meyer Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API