Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1947No. 36,966; No. 36,967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, C. J.:

These cases were consolidated for hearing in this court for the reason that the same legal principles apply to both of them. The abstract and briefs are confined to case No. 36,966. That was an action to recover a money judgment for damages for the alleged breach of a contract and other grievances. The defendants named are the Paramount Film Distributing Corporation (hereinafter called defendant) and R. M.. Copeland, described as the branch manager of defendant. No service of process was had upon him and the case proceeded against the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Grentner v. FehrenschieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Sluss v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Stoner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Lofland v. CromanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. May v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. Patterson v. Philco Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Browning v. BlairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. Gray v. Ray Gill, Frontier Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. Sullivan v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API