Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Forsyth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 13, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Five actions of tort for false and fraudulent representations whereby the plaintiffs' were induced to buy or to refrain from selling shares of preferred stock in the North American Rubber Company, as stated and described in the opinion. Writs dated respectively February 11, March 8, April 29, May 18 and June 8, 1915. In each case the defendant demurred.

Read the full summary

Five actions of tort for false and fraudulent representations whereby the plaintiffs' were induced to buy or to refrain from selling shares of preferred stock in the North American Rubber Company, as stated and described in the opinion. Writs dated respectively February 11, March 8, April 29, May 18 and June 8, 1915. In each case the defendant demurred. The demurrers, as well as demurrers of the same defendant in thirty-two other actions each brought against him by a different plaintiff, came on to be heard before McLaughlin, J., who made orders overruling all the demurrers and by agreement…

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

These are actions of deceit brought by thirty-seven plaintiffs, who allege that, relying on certain printed and oral representations made or caused to be made by the defendant, they were induced to purchase or to refrain from selling shares of stock in the North American Rubber Company, a corporation organized in 1909, for the purpose of manufacturing a substitute for rubber. The defendant demurred to all the declarations, the demurrers were overruled and five typical declarations, with their respective demurrers, are reported to this court.

It is further alleged in each declaration, that in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Windram v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Hunnewell v. DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Van Houten v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Kimball v. BangsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1939
  2. Cohen v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Stern Bros. v. New York Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Abelson v. StrongDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
  5. Garcia v. FantauzziCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API