State v. Booker
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Gene Booker appeals from his conviction and sentence for aggravated trafficking (possession of more than three times the bulk amount) in heroin. Booker contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel as a result of a conflict of interest in his trial counsel’s joint representation of both Booker and his common-law wife, Jimmie Booker. Booker also contends that the trial court erred by denying, without a hearing, his motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant. Booker’s motion to suppress was based upon an allegation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. CooperriderOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
3Cited by10 opinions
- Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- State v. FryerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. WatkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. LenoirOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.