Legal Opinion

State v. Watkins

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 2010No. 08-CA-122PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Jon Watkins, appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of aggravated robbery and one count of kidnapping. Watkins argues that his convictions are against the manifest weight of the evidence and that they are not supported by sufficient evidence. He claims that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. Watkins maintains that his sentence is contrary to law because the court failed to expressly address either the purposes and principles of felony sentencing set forth in R.C. 2929.11 or the seriousness and recidivism factors…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. GatewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. BarkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. MurphyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. WatkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API