Parks v. Hays
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM MOORE. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Moore •County. M. E. Smallman, J.
1Opinion of the Court
LüRTON, J.
This is an action of unlawful de-Stainer. The plaintiff is the lessor, and the defend-ant her tenant, who entered under a lease for the -term of three years. Rotes vvere executed for the *162rent reserved, payable six months apart, for equal sums. The first two notes were not paid at maturity, and suit was brought upon them as they severally fell due, and the landlord’s lien enforced by attachment..
While the second suit was pending, this action was begun to recover possession under a forfeiture. The case was heard without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff.
The…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Lamson Consol. Store Service Co. v. BowlandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Matthews v. CroffordTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Charleston, South Carolina, Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Elder v. EppersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Nashville Record Productions, Inc. v. Mr. Transmission, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.