Legal Opinion

Calixto v. United States Department of the Army

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 16, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-1551Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LUCAS CALIXTO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-1551 (ESH) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are United States Army soldiers who enlisted through the Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (“MAVNI”) program, “which enables certain non-U.S. citizens to enlist and serve in the U.S. Armed Forces.” (2d Am.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API