Legal Opinion
Davis v. New York City Housing Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 11, 1999No. 90 Civ. 0628 (RWS), 92 Civ. 4873 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Once again before the Court, this time on remand, is the motion by Pauline Davis, et al (the “Davis Plaintiffs”) to enjoin the defendant New York City Housing Authority (“NYCHA” or the “Authority”) from implementing the Working Family Preference (“WFP”) contained in its proposed changes to its Tenant Selection and Assignment Plan (“TSAP”) incorporated by reference in the Consent Decree in this action. In addition, NYCHA has moved to lift the preliminary injunction previously issued. Upon the findings and conclusions set forth below, the motion of the Davis…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Davis v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Davis v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002