Legal Opinion

Toledo v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-4487PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GILES, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff David Toledo (“Toledo”) filed this suit in Pennsylvania state court on May 7, 1992. Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) removed the case to this court on the basis of diversity of citizenship and an amount in controversy in excess of $50,000. Our decision is governed by Pennsylvania law.

The complaint alleges facts as follows. Toledo is a scientist who does research on topics of importance to the pharmaceutical industry. When he moved into an apartment in May 1990, he stored 30 boxes and a suitcase in a separate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pastierik v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Lardas v. Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. General State Authority v. Planet InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Levenson v. SouserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Caln Village Associates, LP v. Home Indem. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Hornberger v. Commonwealth Security Systems Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1998
  3. Manion v. Roadway Package System, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1996
  4. Yingling v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. HUDSON v. ECONOMY FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API