Legal Opinion

Tri-State Delta Chemicals, Inc. v. Crow

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 13, 2001No. 01-624PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D ONALD L. Corbin, Justice.

This appeal raises an issue of first impression: Whether a defendant’s default on a suit filed in circuit court effectively waives any right to compel arbitration. Appellant Tri-State Delta Chemicals, Inc., d/b/a UAP Mid-South (UAP), appeals the order of the Desha County Circuit Court granting a default judgment in favor of Appellees Nelson Crow; William Day; William Day & Sons; Larry Hulis; Moss Farms, Inc.; Peacock & Staudinger; Prairie Creek Farms, Inc.; Greg Simpson; and Guy Teeter. For reversal, UAP argues that the trial court erred in granting the default…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Woodruff v. SpenceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Sevenprop Associates v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Walton v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. String v. KaziSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. MilburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Servewell Plumbing, LLC v. Summit Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Advocat, Inc. v. HeideCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. NCS Healthcare of Arkansas, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. MilburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API