Legal Opinion · Dissent
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Milburn
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 10, 2003No. 01-1318, 01-1008PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Dissent
Jim Hannah, Justice, dissenting. disagree with the majority’s be in this case.
I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s holding that Rule 11 sanctions should be imposed in this case.
The majority dismisses U.S. Bank’s argument that it had a good-faith belief that the trial court’s order granting summary judgment was a final and appealable order. The majority held that all the cases cited by the bank in support of its argument that a trial court need not always establish the amount of damages in order for the order to be final and appealable were inapposite.
The majority…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cole v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Sharp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Cjc Holdings, Inc., D/B/A Artcarved, a Corporation v. Wright & Lato, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. MilburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Dodge v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. MilburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003