Legal Opinion
Montgomery County Council v. Leizman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 25, 1973No. [No. 266, September Term, 1972.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
We are confronted here with variations on a familiar theme. Malasky v. Montgomery County Council, 258 Md. 612, 267 A. 2d 182 (1970); Norbeck Village Joint Venture v. Montgomery County Council, 254 Md. 59, 254 A. 2d 700 (1969); Scull v. Coleman, 251 Md. 6, 246 A. 2d 223 (1968); Hunt v. Montgomery County, 248 Md. 403, 237 A. 2d 35 (1968). It turns out, however, that there is really only one question to be resolved, i.e., whether the zoning application (No. F-657) filed by The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (Commission) proposes a comprehensive rezoning bearing a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Norbeck Village Joint Venture v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Richmond Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Scull v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Malasky v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
3Cited by9 opinions
- Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- County Council v. OffenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- County Council v. District Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Animal Welfare Institute v. Beech Ridge Energy LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Long v. BursonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.