Isackson v. Duluth Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of tbe district court for St. Louis county, Moer, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict for $2,500 in favor of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
Tbe defendant appealed from tbe order of tbe district court for St. Louis county denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding tbe verdict, or for a new trial, upon certain grounds stated in tbe moving papers.
Tbe plaintiff, in bis complaint, alleged that while be was walking upon defendant’s track in a public street in tbe city of Duluth tbe defendant did carelessly, wantonly, recklessly and unlawfully run and operate one of its cars in such manner and at such a reckless *28rate of speed, as to cause said car to strike and run over the plaintiff, and greatly injure him personally, for which he…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Terien v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Anderson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by9 opinions
- Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. GodseySupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Christy v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Hart v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Hoffman v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.