Legal Opinion

Isackson v. Duluth Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1898No. Nos. 11,296—(102)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of tbe district court for St. Louis county, Moer, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict for $2,500 in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

Tbe defendant appealed from tbe order of tbe district court for St. Louis county denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding tbe verdict, or for a new trial, upon certain grounds stated in tbe moving papers.

Tbe plaintiff, in bis complaint, alleged that while be was walking upon defendant’s track in a public street in tbe city of Duluth tbe defendant did carelessly, wantonly, recklessly and unlawfully run and operate one of its cars in such manner and at such a reckless *28rate of speed, as to cause said car to strike and run over the plaintiff, and greatly injure him personally, for which he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Terien v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Anderson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. GodseySupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  2. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Christy v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Hart v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. Hoffman v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API