Legal Opinion

White & Case LLP v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 3, 2009No. 03-2800CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WOLSKI, Judge.

The motions presently before the Court in this matter concern the interpretation of the words “any ease,” as these are used in the provision which limits the amount of compensation that may be paid to informers under the moiety statute, 19 U.S.C. § 1619(c). Plaintiff White & Case LLP alleges that it provided original information regarding ninety-eight separate invoices (or other documents related to shipments) which were fraudulent and violated customs laws, and argues that each violation should be considered a separate case for purposes of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Florida Home Medical Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Crutchfield v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Rochlis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API