Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thomas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1977No. 353PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that he is entitled to discharge because trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a meritorious. Rule 1100 claim in post-verdict motions. See Rule 1123, Pa.R.Crim.P.; 19 P.S.Appendix. We remand for a hearing on trial counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to preserve an arguably meritorious Rule 1100 claim. Commonwealth v. Hubbard, 472 Pa. 259, 372 A.2d 687 (1977); Commonwealth v. Twiggs, 460 Pa. 105, 331 A.2d 440 (1975).

Appellant was arrested on December 1, 1974, on charges of rape and related offenses. The Commonwealth issued a criminal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RamseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. BrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. ConnorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. BrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API