Commonwealth v. Thomas
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that he is entitled to discharge because trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a meritorious. Rule 1100 claim in post-verdict motions. See Rule 1123, Pa.R.Crim.P.; 19 P.S.Appendix. We remand for a hearing on trial counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to preserve an arguably meritorious Rule 1100 claim. Commonwealth v. Hubbard, 472 Pa. 259, 372 A.2d 687 (1977); Commonwealth v. Twiggs, 460 Pa. 105, 331 A.2d 440 (1975).
Appellant was arrested on December 1, 1974, on charges of rape and related offenses. The Commonwealth issued a criminal…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RamseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. ConnorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.