Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 7, 2001No. 91-4411PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the parents of a minor child challenge the constitutionality of the procedures used in juvenile court to temporarily remove their child to the physical custody of the county department of children services pending a hearing on the merits of the agency’s request for temporary custody. This appeal requires us to determine whether the district court properly dismissed the case on the basis of the Younger abstention doctrine. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). We hold that the court properly dismissed without prejudice the parents’ claims for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. John Doe v. Univ. of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Alexander v. MorganDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
  3. Burlington Insurance Company v. Panacorp, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
  4. Golf Vill. N., LLC v. City of PowellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
  5. Meyers v. Franklin County Court of Common PleasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API