State v. Follett

Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the second degree and three convictions for robbery in the first degree. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain one of the convictions for robbery, that there was insufficient evidence to justify his sentence as a dangerous offender under ORS 161.725 and that the sentences were excessive and constitute cruel and unusual punishment. We affirm.

Defendant was charged in one indictment (C8603-31278) with attempted murder, assault in the first degree and robbery in the first degree, all arising out of the robbery of a convenience…